Skip to content

[LWG 3] P2407R5 Freestanding Library: Partial Classes #6702

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 17, 2023
Merged

[LWG 3] P2407R5 Freestanding Library: Partial Classes #6702

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 17, 2023

Conversation

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Fixes #6661
Fixes cplusplus/papers#1077

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the post-2023-11 milestone Nov 16, 2023
JohelEGP
JohelEGP suggested changes Nov 17, 2023
View reviewed changes
@jensmaurer jensmaurer changed the title P2407R5 Freestanding Library: Partial Classes [LWG 3] P2407R5 Freestanding Library: Partial Classes Nov 17, 2023
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Dec 17, 2023

@jensmaurer, @jwakely is changing value() to **this still useful/beneficial after 199ed18 / "LWG3973 Monadic operations should be ADL-proof" / https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#3973?

@tkoeppe tkoeppe force-pushed the motions-2023-11-lwg-3 branch 2 times, most recently from ace9d8e to 397a5a6 Compare December 17, 2023 14:33
tkoeppe
tkoeppe reviewed Dec 17, 2023
View reviewed changes
source/support.tex Outdated
#define @\defnlibxname{cpp_lib_format_ranges}@ 202207L // also in \libheader{format}
#define @\defnlibxname{cpp_lib_formatters}@ 202302L // also in \libheader{stacktrace}, \libheader{thread}
#define @\defnlibxname{cpp_lib_forward_like}@ 202207L // freestanding, also in \libheader{utility}
#define @\defnlibxname{cpp_lib_freestanding_algorithm}@ 202311L // freestanding, also in \libheader{algorithm}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jensmaurer, @jwakely Please note that I'm reconciling this with Motion 2 by adding <numeric> here, too, for the saturation arithmetic.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jwakely OK, we should make a decision here. Adding a new macro for numeric seems reasonable, too, shall I go ahead with that?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I think so. I've pinged Barry and Ben on the PR for that change, for extra eyes.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Dec 17, 2023

@jensmaurer, @jwakely is changing value() to **this still useful/beneficial after 199ed18 / "LWG3973 Monadic operations should be ADL-proof" / https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#3973?

Hm, why is there even a separate commit for the **this changes in [optional.monadic]? Those changes are part of the paper. I'll squash them.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe force-pushed the motions-2023-11-lwg-3 branch from bcc75c7 to 0414c36 Compare December 17, 2023 14:49
@tkoeppe
[version.syn] Add <numeric> to cpp_lib_freestanding_algorithm macro
148e03a 
The cpp_lib_freestanding_algorithm macro was created by this
paper (LWG Motion 3, P2407R5), but the previous paper (LWG-2, P0543R3)
already added to the freestanding algorithms, so it should also define
this feature test macro.
@tkoeppe tkoeppe force-pushed the motions-2023-11-lwg-3 branch from 0414c36 to 148e03a Compare December 17, 2023 14:52
@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 31f4e1d into main Dec 17, 2023
@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Dec 18, 2023

@jensmaurer, @jwakely is changing value() to **this still useful/beneficial after 199ed18 / "LWG3973 Monadic operations should be ADL-proof" / https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#3973?

Unfortunately, 3973 was badly broken, see LWG 4015. **this would be less broken.

But in terms of what's actually been approved for the draft, I think 3973 takes precedence, despite being broken :-( 3973 was explicitly intended to "fix" the changes made here to avoid ADL for operator*., even though that's a complete non-issue in most real code, whereas what 3973 requires won't even compile for many real cases.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Dec 18, 2023 •
edited
Loading

@jwakely So shoud we change **this back to *val for now?

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Dec 18, 2023

Sending a follow-up commit now.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the motions-2023-11-lwg-3 branch March 23, 2024 11:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jwakely jwakely jwakely left review comments

@tkoeppe tkoeppe tkoeppe left review comments

+1 more reviewer

@JohelEGP JohelEGP JohelEGP approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

post-2023-11

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[2023-11 LWG Motion 3] Freestanding Library: Partial Classes

5 participants

@jensmaurer @tkoeppe @jwakely @JohelEGP